2026-02-12 → 2026-08-07 · GitHub Actions Last-year snapshot 2026-02-12 → 2026-08-07 · GitHub Actions Last-year snapshot

NEXUS LIFE-CYCLE WORKFLOW VISUALIZER

这是 zero-entropy-lab 与 welcome-to-github 的双工作流可视化主页, 用一页展示年度用量, 运行效率, 失败成本, 步骤差异, 以及实际运行日志证据

A single-page visualizer for the zero-entropy-lab and welcome-to-github workflows, showing yearly usage, execution efficiency, failure cost, stage differences, and concrete run-log evidence

Annual Actions Load

年度负载对比Yearly load comparison

这里使用 GitHub Actions last year 数据, 1 是 zero, 2 是 welcome, 窗口 2026-02-12 → 2026-08-07

This section uses the GitHub Actions last-year metrics, 1 is zero, 2 is welcome, window 2026-02-12 → 2026-08-07

1 · Zero total minutes
3,870
年度工作流总分钟数
Total workflow minutes for last year
1 · Zero job runs
3,172
年度 job run 总数
Total job runs for last year
2 · Welcome total minutes
7,045
年度工作流总分钟数
Total workflow minutes for last year
2 · Welcome job runs
5,786
年度 job run 总数
Total job runs for last year
Compute Budget

计算预算Compute budget

Welcome 约消耗 Zero 的 1.82 倍 Actions 分钟, 两仓共享同一 NEXUS 生命周期骨架, 承担不同的责任边界

Welcome uses about 1.82x the Actions minutes of Zero — both repos share the same NEXUS life-cycle skeleton while carrying different responsibility boundaries

Zero minutes
3,870
Welcome minutes
7,045
Zero runs
3,172
Welcome runs
5,786
Efficiency And Failure Cost

效率与失败成本Efficiency and failure cost

两边平均排队时间都是 3s, 失败率都是 2%, 差异主要在年度负载和失败分钟数, zero 约 70 failed minutes, welcome 是 26 failed minutes

Both lanes have a 3s average queue time and 2% job failure rate, while the main difference is annual load and failed-job minutes, zero is about 70 failed minutes and welcome is 26

37sZero avg run
42sWelcome avg run
3s / 3sAvg queue
2%Zero fail rate
2%Welcome fail rate
70 / 26Failed minutes
Two Concrete Workflow Lanes

两个具体工作流Two concrete workflow lanes

这不是泛生态展示, 而是把 zero 和 welcome 两条 NEXUS CORTEX Life Cycle 直接展开成可读步骤

This is not a generic ecosystem page, it expands the zero and welcome NEXUS CORTEX Life Cycle workflows into readable stages

1
zero-entropy-lab
Integrity and State Core
Integrity and State Core
3,870 min
3,172job runs
37savg run
2%failure
Verify foundation
编译 30 后端文件 + 7 模块全部通过
Compile 30 backend files + 7 modules all OK
zero only
Document hygiene
维护 JSONL 知识库 · 1,687 记录
Maintain JSONL knowledge base · 1,687 records
shared
Harvest signals
收割外部仓库情报 · 4 更新
Harvest external signals · 4 updated
shared
Project mapping
投影文档→仓库关系 · 211 文档
Project doc→repo relations · 211 docs
shared
Canonicalize + prune
规范化 888 实体 · 哈希链验证 · 保护路径裁剪
Canonicalize 888 entities · hash chain · prune protected
zero focus
Rebuild + ingest
1,687 记忆重建 + 35 文件映射入 Cortex
1,687 memories + 35 files into Cortex
shared
Ponder
382 节点 · 211 边 · 密度 1.15 · FRAGMENTED
382 nodes · 211 edges · density 1.15 · FRAGMENTED
shared
Evolve
净化 + 每日演化 · 认知报告 + 任务简报
Purification + daily cycle · cognitive report
shared
Re-verify + commit
全部 7 模块重验 → 11 文件 · +1,477 −268
7 modules re-verified → 11 files · +1,477 −268
writeback
2
welcome-to-github
Harvester and Public Surface
Harvester and Public Surface
7,045 min
5,786job runs
42savg run
2%failure
Verify foundation
编译 15 生命周期文件 + 34 测试全部通过
Compile 15 lifecycle files + 34 tests OK
welcome only
Document hygiene
维护 JSONL 知识库 · 1,350 记录
Maintain JSONL knowledge base · 1,350 records
shared
Harvest external facts
扫描外部 AI 仓库信号 · 全部已最新
Scan external AI repos · all current
welcome only
Project mapping
投影文档→仓库关系 · 20 文档
Project doc→repo relations · 20 docs
shared
Canonicalize + prune
规范化 692 实体 · 保护路径裁剪
Canonicalize 692 entities · prune protected
shared
Rebuild + ingest
Schema 重建 + 16 文件映射入 Cortex
Rebuild from schema + 16 files into Cortex
shared
Ponder
PageRank 中心性 · 结构直觉 · 自驱目标
PageRank centrality · structural intuition · self-driven goal
shared
Evolve
AST 变异沙盒通过 · 信任网关活跃 · 量化仪表盘
AST sandbox passed · Trust Gateway · quantitative dashboard
welcome focus
Re-verify + commit
34 测试重验通过 → 4 文件 · +90 −15
34 tests re-verified → 4 files · +90 −15
writeback
Step Comparison Matrix

步骤对比矩阵Step comparison matrix

两边共同拥有相同的 NEXUS 生命周期阶段, 但实施方式不同 — 比较同一阶段在不同仓库如何执行

Both lanes share the same NEXUS life-cycle stages but implement them differently — comparing how each stage executes across repositories

Stage
1 · zero
2 · welcome
Compile & Verify
30 backend files compiled · 7 test modules all OK
15 lifecycle files compiled · 34 tests OK
Document hygiene
1,687 records · 11 files · 0 duplicates
1,350 records · 10 files · 0 duplicates
Harvest
0 failed · 4 updated
0 failed · 0 updated (all current)
Project
211 docs · 39 repos · 211 relations
20 docs · 15 repos · 20 relations
Canonicalize
888 entities · 799 relations · hash chain verified
692 entities · 658 relations · 0 dangling
Prune protected
aegis-cortex, ballast, index.html, assets/**
horizon-cortex, parallax
Rebuild
1,687 memories restored from knowledge fragments
from schemas + JSONL fragments
Ingest
35 files mapped into Cortex
16 files mapped into Cortex
Ponder
382 nodes · 211 edges · density 1.15 · FRAGMENTED
PageRank centrality · isolation risk · self-driven goal
Evolve
purification · daily cycle · cognitive report
AST sandbox passed · Trust Gateway · quantitative dashboard
Re-verify
7 modules all OK · foundation verification passed
34 tests re-verified · canonicalize + rebuild OK
Commit
11 files · +1,477 −268 · cognitive update
4 files · +90 −15 · archive + ledger
Run Log Evidence

运行日志证据Run-log evidence

以下数据来自 2026-08-07 最新一次两仓同步运行, 不是样例, 是可验证的公开记录

The following data is from the August 7, 2026 synchronized run — not a sample, but a verifiable public record

CURRENT · 2026-08-07
[zero] verify 30 backend files compiled, 7 test modules, all OK
[zero] hygiene 1,687 records, 11 knowledge files, 0 duplicates
[zero] harvest 0 failed, 4 updated
[zero] project 211 docs, 39 repositories, 211 relations mapped
[zero] canonicalize 888 entities, 799 relations, hash chain verified (0 broken)
[zero] prune protected: aegis-cortex · ballast · index.html · assets · scripts · styles
[zero] rebuild 1,687 memories restored from knowledge fragments
[zero] ingest 35 files mapped into Cortex
[zero] ponder 382 nodes, 211 edges, FRAGMENTED_3_ORPHANS, density 1.15
[zero] evolve purification complete, cognitive report + 2 missions generated
[zero] re-verify 7 test modules all OK, foundation verification passed
[zero] commit 11 files, +1,477 −268, cognitive update pushed
[welcome] verify 15 lifecycle files compiled, 34 tests OK
[welcome] hygiene 1,350 records, 10 knowledge files, 0 duplicates
[welcome] harvest 0 failed, 0 updated (all sources current)
[welcome] project 20 docs, 15 repositories, 20 relations mapped
[welcome] canonicalize 692 entities, 658 relations, 0 duplicates, 0 dangling
[welcome] prune protected: horizon-cortex · parallax
[welcome] rebuild from schemas + JSONL fragments
[welcome] ingest 16 files mapped into Cortex
[welcome] ponder PageRank centrality: NEXUS System, isolation risk, self-driven goal
[welcome] evolve AST sandbox passed, Trust Gateway active, quantitative dashboard rendered
[welcome] re-verify 34 tests re-verified, canonicalize + rebuild OK
[welcome] commit 4 files, +90 −15, archive + ledger updated
HISTORICAL ARCHIVE · 2026-06-28 (click to expand)
[zero] rebuild Reconstruction Complete, 49397 memories restored
[zero] ingest 42 files mapped into Cortex
[zero] ponder nodes 70, topology HIGHLY_STRUCTURED_ZERO_ORPHANS, graph density 3.54
[zero] tests tests OK, MCP and server checks passed
[zero] commit 10 files changed, 545 insertions, cognitive report created
[welcome] harvest transformers, nexent, astron-agent, vllm, dify, mediapipe, markitdown, python-genai
[welcome] ingest 14 files mapped into Cortex
[welcome] ponder isolation risk, structural intuition, PageRank centrality, self-driven goal
[welcome] evolve AST sandbox passed, Trust Gateway Active, quantitative ledger rendered
[welcome] commit 15 files changed, 230 insertions, archive and ledger updated
Zero-Basics Explanation

0基础解析Zero-basics explanation

这部分给第一次看到 GitHub Actions 的人看, 不预设 CI/CD 背景

This part is for people seeing GitHub Actions for the first time, no CI/CD background required

什么是 workflow

What is a workflow

workflow 是仓库里的自动流程, 通常放在 .github/workflows 目录, 它告诉 GitHub 什么时候运行, 运行哪些 job, 每个 job 做什么

A workflow is an automated process stored in a repository, usually under .github/workflows, it tells GitHub when to run, which jobs to run, and what each job should do

什么是 job run

What is a job run

job run 是一次具体执行, 比如 checkout, setup python, rebuild, ingest, test, commit 都可以作为步骤出现在一次 job run 里

A job run is one concrete execution, steps such as checkout, setup python, rebuild, ingest, test, and commit can appear inside a job run

什么是 total minutes

What are total minutes

total minutes 表示工作流在 runner 上消耗的总运行时间, 数字越高, 说明这一条 lane 年度执行负载越重

Total minutes means the total runner time consumed by workflows — the higher the number, the greater the yearly execution volume

为什么看 queue time

Why queue time matters

queue time 是 job 等待 runner 的时间, 这里两边都是 3s, 表示调度等待不是主要差异, 差异主要来自实际执行量

Queue time is how long a job waits for a runner, both lanes are 3s here, so scheduling delay is not the main difference, execution volume is

为什么看 failure rate

Why failure rate matters

failure rate 表示失败 job 的比例, 两边都是 2%, 说明稳定性同级, failed job usage 用来观察失败消耗的分钟成本

Failure rate is the share of failed jobs, both lanes are 2%, so reliability is similar, failed job usage shows the minute cost of failed work

怎么读这页

How to read this page

先看 1 和 2 的年度数字, 再看两条 lane 的步骤, 最后用日志控制台验证这些数字背后的真实行为

Start with the yearly numbers for 1 and 2, then read the two lanes, then use the log console to connect the metrics to concrete behavior

当前仓库

Current Repository

本页保留双工作流历史展示 当前实现 可靠性边界与 Aegis 研究文档以仓库 current main 为准

This page preserves the historical dual-workflow exhibit Current implementation reliability boundaries and Aegis research documentation follow repository current main

GitHub ↗ README ↗ Aegis ↗